Understand

Understand·Social Protection·France

Pensions
by pay-as-you-go

€340 billion a year. 1.7 workers per retiree. Zero euros in reserve. A demographic contract breaking silently — and whose bill is passed to those who come next.

SCROLL TO UNDERSTAND
01 The pyramid that flips over

In 1950, France had
4,0 workers per retiree.

Youth (< 20 yrs)
Workers (20-64 yrs)
Retirees (65 and over)
1950

02 The promise that keeps growing

Born in 1900 — retirement lasts
2 years.

Sources: INSEE long series · effective ages DARES/COR · POPLEG 2024 projections. Retirement duration = average age at death of retirees − effective retirement age.
03 The generational trap

Four generations, four balances
— the one who pays is never the one who receives.

●  The invisible rule

The later you are born,
the heavier the bill.

Without accumulated capital, the system redistributes in reverse: from contributors to those leaving. When the pyramid flips, it is the contributors who grow poorer — they inherit a contract they never voted for.

04 The patience curve

Another system is possible
— funded pensions.

Two settings, a single exit at 67: how much you set aside each month, and the age at which you start. The return used — 7% real net per year — is neither bold nor optimistic: it is the historical average of a diversified global portfolio over 125 years. What surprises is the shape of the result. Not a straight line — a curve that rears up.

Age at which you start saving
25 yrs
Monthly savings
200 €/mo
Capital at 67 0

Constant contribution, retirement at 67, 7%/yr real net return (historical average of a diversified 60/40 global portfolio, 1900-2024). The curve shows the effect of compound interest on capital that starts early.

05 Head to head

Your 0 € contributed
— two opposite fates.

You set above: 200 € per month starting at 25 ans. That is 0 € over the career. Depending on the architecture that receives them, the same euros produce two radically different outcomes.

Pay-as-you-go

An intergenerational
transfer

Your contributions fund today's pensions. In return, you are promised the same, later.

WORKERScontributions 100% paid FUND0 € at once RETIREEStoday no stock — direct flow from contributor to pensioner
Your 0 € become 0 € of capital in your name at 67
Promised monthly pension 0 paid for ~20 years · i.e. the total contributed, with no return
Who holds the money
The State
Source of return
Demography × growth
Inheritable
No
Changeable by vote
Yes, every term
Main risk
Ageing, politics
In a shock

Reforms — later retirement age, lower replacement rate, higher contributions. Extreme case: Greece 2012, −40% on pensions overnight.

vs
Funded

Capital that
belongs to you

Your contributions are invested in markets and grow. At retirement, you draw on your own capital.

YOU · AGE 25contributions INVESTED CAPITAL YOU · AGE 67retirement the same beneficiary at start and end — capital grows in between
Your 0 € become 0 of capital in your name at 67
Monthly income from capital 0 for 20 years · residual capital remains inheritable
Who holds the money
You, via a fund
Source of return
Markets (~7%/yr net)
Inheritable
Yes
Changeable by vote
No — contractual rights
Main risk
Market volatility
In a shock

Progressive de-risking of the portfolio approaching retirement, global diversification. No rolling 20-year window has ever lost money — not after 1929, not after 2008.

Ordinal qualitative assessments — not an exact measure. Sources: OECD Pension Markets 2024 · COR 2023 · Mercer CFA Index 2023.
06 The three pension Europes

Three approaches
— with very unequal results.

European countries fall into three families by the place they give to capital in their pensions. France is alone in the first. Hover a country to see its key figures.

Sources: OECD Pension Markets in Focus 2024 · Mercer CFA Global Pension Index 2023 · Eurostat · COR. Funds / GDP = private pension fund assets relative to GDP.
07 Received ideas

Five objections
— put to the test of the facts.

Funded pensions trigger reflex objections. Some are legitimate — they deserve a serious answer, not dismissal. Flip each card to see what the data says.

  Conclusion

« Promising a pension is easy.
Finding the workers who will pay for it —
that is another story. »

Pay-as-you-go is not bad in itself. It worked remarkably for thirty years, on a demographic pyramid that no longer exists. Refusing to see it is not solidarity — it is passing the bill to the next generations.

Sweden did it in 1998. The Netherlands had done it before. Switzerland always has.
The question is not whether it is possible — it is how many more years we will wait.

Sources & methodology
  • COR — 2023 Annual Report, financial projections of the pension system.
  • INSEE — Demographic projections 2021-2070, central scenario.
  • OECD — Pension Markets in Focus 2024, pension funds by country.
  • Mercer CFA Institute — Global Pension Index 2023.
  • DREES — Retirees and pensions, 2024 edition.