€340 billion a year.1.7 workers per retiree. Zero euros in reserve. A demographic contract breaking silently — and whose bill is passed to those who come next.
SCROLL TO UNDERSTAND
01
01The pyramid that flips over
In 1950, France had 4,0workers per retiree.
Youth (< 20 yrs)
—
Workers (20-64 yrs)
—
Retirees (65 and over)
—
1950
02
02The promise that keeps growing
Born in 1900 — retirement lasts 2years.
Sources: INSEE long series · effective ages DARES/COR · POPLEG 2024 projections. Retirement duration = average age at death of retirees − effective retirement age.
03
03The generational trap
Four generations, four balances — the one who pays is never the one who receives.
● The invisible rule
The later you are born, the heavier the bill.
Without accumulated capital, the system redistributes in reverse: from contributors to those leaving. When the pyramid flips, it is the contributors who grow poorer — they inherit a contract they never voted for.
04The patience curve
Another system is possible — funded pensions.
Two settings, a single exit at 67: how much you set aside each month, and the age at which you start. The return used — 7% real net per year — is neither bold nor optimistic: it is the historical average of a diversified global portfolio over 125 years. What surprises is the shape of the result. Not a straight line — a curve that rears up.
Age at which you start saving
25 yrs
Monthly savings
200 €/mo
Capital at 670€
●
Constant contribution, retirement at 67, 7%/yr real net return (historical average of a diversified 60/40 global portfolio, 1900-2024). The curve shows the effect of compound interest on capital that starts early.
05Head to head
Your 0 € contributed — two opposite fates.
You set above:
200 € per month starting at 25 ans.
That is 0 € over the career. Depending on the architecture that receives them, the same euros produce two radically different outcomes.
Pay-as-you-go
An intergenerational transfer
Your contributions fund today's pensions. In return, you are promised the same, later.
Your 0 € become0 €of capital in your name at 67
Promised monthly pension0 €paid for ~20 years · i.e. the total contributed, with no return
Who holds the money
The State
Source of return
Demography × growth
Inheritable
No
Changeable by vote
Yes, every term
Main risk
Ageing, politics
vs
Funded
Capital that belongs to you
Your contributions are invested in markets and grow. At retirement, you draw on your own capital.
Your 0 € become0 €of capital in your name at 67
Monthly income from capital0 €for 20 years · residual capital remains inheritable
Who holds the money
You, via a fund
Source of return
Markets (~7%/yr net)
Inheritable
Yes
Changeable by vote
No — contractual rights
Main risk
Market volatility
Ordinal qualitative assessments — not an exact measure. Sources: OECD Pension Markets 2024 · COR 2023 · Mercer CFA Index 2023.
06The three pension Europes
Three approaches — with very unequal results.
European countries fall into three families by the place they give to capital in their pensions. France is alone in the first. Hover a country to see its key figures.
Sources: OECD Pension Markets in Focus 2024 · Mercer CFA Global Pension Index 2023 · Eurostat · COR. Funds / GDP = private pension fund assets relative to GDP.
07Received ideas
Five objections — put to the test of the facts.
Funded pensions trigger reflex objections. Some are legitimate — they deserve a serious answer, not dismissal. Flip each card to see what the data says.
● Conclusion
« Promising a pension is easy. Finding the workers who will pay for it — that is another story. »
Pay-as-you-go is not bad in itself. It worked remarkably for thirty years, on a demographic pyramid that no longer exists. Refusing to see it is not solidarity — it is passing the bill to the next generations.
Sweden did it in 1998. The Netherlands had done it before. Switzerland always has.
The question is not whether it is possible — it is how many more years we will wait.